Why doesn't Asp.net 3.5 appear as an option for the site?

Author Name Status Posted Time Cleopatra Kolmkeita 6/3/2008 3:26:59 AM Author is Offline Hi friends, I have been running 2.0 happily for some time on 2003 Server box, and wanted to try the 3.5 Beta 2 in order to get the AJAX extensions happening. I ran the 3.5 package, which installed successfully. I thought my next step may be to go to my 2.0 test site on the server and change the ASP.NET version in the properties, to enable me to run some new test pages using AJAX. However, the 3.5 option does not appear in the combo box; only 1.0 and 2.0 appear. What's happening here? Why doesn't 3.5 appear as an option for the site? Thanks in advance Cleo.

Subject Author Status Date Re: Why doesn't Asp.net 3.5 appear as an option fo r the site? Theodore Dominingo 6/3/2008 4:25:20 AM Cleo, I noticed that too. I think it is because there ar e no real differences to ASP.NET in the 3.5 framew ork. It is really jus the additional of LINQ and b etter integration of the AJAX framework in Visual Studio from what I can tell. Post Comments Re: Why doesn't Asp.net 3.5 appear as an option fo r the site? Antonio Duccedair 6/3/2008 4:26:01 AM Hi, This is becuase the CLR for .net 3.5 and .net 2.0 is the same , references : http://www.infoq.com/articles/akif-dotnet-architect http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=318241 Post Comments Re: Why doesn't Asp.net 3.5 appear as an option fo r the site? Juanita Terain 6/3/2008 4:26:41 AM Hi Cleopatra, 3.5 and 3.0 is built on top of 2.0. Please look at this diagram. Also just to alert you (something that you are perhaps already aware of )to install it in a VM but not on a working machine as you may have lots of grief later, as this is still in beta.   Post Comments

No Related Articles